The recent rally held by Donald Trump in Montana on Friday has sparked a strong social media reaction due to the choice of music played before the presidential hopeful took to the stage. Celine Dion’s iconic song ‘My Heart Will Go On’ from the Titanic soundtrack was blared out from the speakers, which raised eyebrows among observers. Many took to social media to express their surprise and even question if there was a deliberate attempt to troll Trump by playing a song about a sinking ship.
One important question that arises from this incident is whether the Trump campaign has the proper rights to use Celine Dion’s song publicly at their events. The rights to the song are owned by 20th Century Fox, and there may be concerns about copyright infringement. It remains to be seen whether Dion’s representatives will make a statement regarding this issue.
Interestingly, this is not the first time that ‘My Heart Will Go On’ has been used at a Trump rally. The song was previously played during a rally in 2020, as well as at other events featuring the former president. The consistent use of this particular song has not gone unnoticed by the public, with some even calling out the irony of the situation.
In addition to the song choice, Trump’s speech at the Montana rally included controversial remarks such as misgendering an Algerian boxer and mocking a Democratic Senator. These incidents have added fuel to the fire of criticism against the former president, who has been known for his divisive rhetoric and behavior.
This recent controversy follows a previous complaint by French musician Woodkid regarding the unauthorized use of his music in a campaign video for Trump. Woodkid, who identifies as a proud LGBT+ musician, expressed frustration over his song being used without permission. This incident adds to the growing list of complaints against the Trump campaign for its questionable use of copyrighted material.
The use of Celine Dion’s ‘My Heart Will Go On’ at Trump rallies continues to stir up controversy and raise questions about the campaign’s practices. The repeated use of this song, along with other controversial moments at these events, highlights the ongoing divisiveness and unauthorized use of intellectual property by the former president and his team.
Leave a Reply